English errors and spelling mistakes

haha same thread again (magical races/talents and special abilities) within the description of dragon heartstring wand cores, at the end of the description for wands using heartstring from swedish short-snouts it says ‘skilful’ instead of ‘skillful’

It simply isn’t an adventure worth telling if there aren’t any dragons.
-JRR Tolkien

English errors and spelling mistakes
now its the phoenix feathers as cores; first bullet point in the effects category --> theres no space between the end of the 2nd to last sentence and the last sentence

It simply isn’t an adventure worth telling if there aren’t any dragons.
-JRR Tolkien

English errors and spelling mistakes
dittany stalk as a wand core; last sentence says ‘humaine’ vs ‘humane’, i believe its current state is in french but idk……

It simply isn’t an adventure worth telling if there aren’t any dragons.
-JRR Tolkien

English errors and spelling mistakes
under the second bullet point of the thestral tail hair effects as a wand core it says the following. not sure what it means right here in the underlined and bolded part *insert confused face here*
When someone is rendered unconscious by a spell cast by someone with this core (kil, they remain unconscious until they naturally heal. …

It simply isn’t an adventure worth telling if there aren’t any dragons.
-JRR Tolkien

English errors and spelling mistakes
same thread again what a surprise i know. now under the snallygaster heartstring as wand core effects it says: (see especially the end of the partentheses)
… This bonus to their accuracy applies to all spells cast at non-allies, which are animate beings (you can't gain a +1 accuracy against your termed "ally" target that you have been attacking for those rules lawyers). …
no idea what it means by ‘lawyers’ but… am i reading it super wrong or something? is lawyers actually supposed to be there or not?

It simply isn’t an adventure worth telling if there aren’t any dragons.
-JRR Tolkien

English errors and spelling mistakes
on to wand woods, in the alder explanation it shows the following:
Wand Choice: Pairs well with agreeable witches and wizards.[/color]
not sure why the [/color] is there cause theres no beginning bracket for it and there is no special color in the words. but yeah

It simply isn’t an adventure worth telling if there aren’t any dragons.
-JRR Tolkien

English errors and spelling mistakes
last sentence of first paragraph on explanation of wands made with ash wood it says ‘loose’ instead of ‘lose’. in the magical races/talents and special abilities thread. again.

It simply isn’t an adventure worth telling if there aren’t any dragons.
-JRR Tolkien

English errors and spelling mistakes
on the use of dogwood for wands within the magical races/talents and special abilities thread, this part just needs a period after loud
Wand Choice: Makes peculiar wands that refuse to perform nonverbal spells. This wand prefers people who are loud

It simply isn’t an adventure worth telling if there aren’t any dragons.
-JRR Tolkien

English errors and spelling mistakes
same thread, at the end of the first sentence of the second paragraph detailing elm wood and its use for wands it says ‘heir’ when it should say ‘their’

It simply isn’t an adventure worth telling if there aren’t any dragons.
-JRR Tolkien

English errors and spelling mistakes
[quote]@Paris Soliel Everything you mentioned above has been addressed, except for the “rules-lawyers,” as that is a term that describes people that tend to pick apart rules to find loopholes. Think of it as a little joke about the people reading these parameters.

Otherwise, everything has been fixed.